Legal Opinion
Martin v. National Bank of Alaska
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided January 21, 1993No. A86-548 CivilPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLLAND, Chief Judge.
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
The defendant, National Bank of Alaska (“NBA”), brings a renewed motion for summary judgment 1 as to the entirety of plaintiffs first amended complaint. The Secretary 2 opposes NBA’s motion for summary judgment, and has filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment. 3 In the cross-motion, the Secretary requests summary judgment be granted in favor of the Government as to the Secretary’s claims that NBA’s involvement in three loan transactions violates Sections 406(a)(1)(D), (b)(1), and (b)(2) of ERISA, 4 and that the receipt of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harsch v. Eisenberg (In Re Eisenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Tibble v. Edison InternationalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. SinicropiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In re Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Losquadro v. FGH Realty Credit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.