State v. Myers
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from a pretrial order dismissing a charge of refusal to submit to a chemical test, the state argues that the district court erred in concluding that because the implied-consent advisory administered to respondent did not inform respondent that test refusal is a gross misdemeanor that may result in harsher penalties than test failure, the advisory violated respondent’s due-process rights. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
State Trooper Stephen Willert stopped to investigate a vehicle that he saw stopped on the shoulder of Highway 52. Willert identified the driver…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MeldeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006