Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 2006No. A05-1604PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from a pretrial order dismissing a charge of refusal to submit to a chemical test, the state argues that the district court erred in concluding that because the implied-consent advisory administered to respondent did not inform respondent that test refusal is a gross misdemeanor that may result in harsher penalties than test failure, the advisory violated respondent’s due-process rights. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

State Trooper Stephen Willert stopped to investigate a vehicle that he saw stopped on the shoulder of Highway 52. Willert identified the driver…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MeldeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API