Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gildehaus v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 2016No. CV-15-619Published

1ConcurrenceCliff Hoofman, Judge

While I agree with the majority’s decision to affirm, I would do so based on the circuit court’s alternative finding that substantial evidence supports the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Board’s decision to approve the transfer of the retail liquor permit to appellee Christopher Moore. Thus, I must respectfully concur.

In appellant Sarah Gildehaus’s first point on appeal, she argues that the circuit court erred in dismissing her amended petition due to a lack of standing. I agree and would not affirm on this basis; In her petition, Gildehaus alleged that- she was injured by the Board’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. C.C.B. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Chubb Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Miller County Circuit Court, Third DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Department of Health & Hum. Servs. v. RcSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Hewitt v. GageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API