State v. Salgado
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
In this case assigned to the general calendar, defendant filed a motion to amend his docketing statement at the same time that he filed his brief-in-chief. The motion sought to add additional facts of which counsel had become aware by reviewing the transcript after the case was assigned to the general calendar. We deny the motion. In appeals filed after July 1, 1990, and assigned to the general calendar, amendments to docketing statements are unnecessary.
July 1, 1990, was the effective date of the amendment to SCRA 1986, 12-213(A)(3), appearing in the 1990 cumulative…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance AgencyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CalancheNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gillin v. Carrows Restaurants, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Eldorado at Santa Fe, Inc. v. CookNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Oakey v. May Maple Pharmacy, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. BarreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.