Legal Opinion
Chesapeake Construction Corp. v. Rodman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 3, 1970No. [No. 132, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
Chesapeake Construction Corporation (Chesapeake) is a Delaware corporation; its avowed purpose is the development of real property. In June 1967 Samuel J. Rod-man (Samuel) owned 75 of the 100 shares of its stock. He was also its president and one of its directors. Karl Rodman (Karl), Samuel’s brother, owned the remaining 25 shares. He was its secretary and treasurer and a director. The record is silent as to the existence of any other directors at that time. Early in June 1967 Samuel and Bella, his wife, conveyed a 123 acre Prince George’s County tract, known as “Tantallon Hills Subdivision,”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman Steam Coal Co. v. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ParishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
- Indurated Concrete Corp. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Cummings v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Storetrax.com, Inc. v. GurlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Toner v. Baltimore Envelope Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Mountain Manor Realty, Inc. v. BuccheriCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Farber v. Servan Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Stevens Ex Rel. Park View Corp. v. RichardsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.