Legal Opinion

Toner v. Baltimore Envelope Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 10, 1985No. Misc. No. 9, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Appellant, Mary P. Toner (Toner), is a nonvoting shareholder with a minority ownership in a closely held corporation. She complains of the corporation’s having bought the nonvoting stock of some of the other shareholders without having bought her nonvoting stock. Appellant asserts that, solely because the corporation made those purchases, it became obliged to purchase all of her nonvoting stock at the same price. We shall decline, for reasons hereinafter set forth, to adopt that per se rule as Maryland law.

This case comes to us from the United States District Court for the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Hollis v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Lerner v. LernerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Strougo v. BassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API