Legal Opinion

Farkas v. Rumore

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 22, 1996No. 134, Docket 95-9262PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Louis Stanton, J.)., Judge Stanton dismissed Farkas’s claims, holding that Farkas had failed to exhaust his contractual remedies. We dismiss his appeal as untimely- '

Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1) requires that an appellant file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the date of entry of judgment or order appealed from. The Supreme Court has stated that “the taking of an appeal within the prescribed time limits is mandatory and jurisdictional.” Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196, 203,108 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Air Line Pilots Association v. Precision Valley Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Tommie Kline v. Department of Health & Human Services Indian Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ball v. McDowellTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cody, Inc. v. Town Of WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. American Safety Indemnity Co. v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Cody, Inc. v. Town of WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Dimeff v. Good (In Re Good)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API