Legal Opinion

Hite v. Fisher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erorn the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellee sued Jacob H. Hite in attachment, and caused a summons in garnishment to be issued against the appellants William N. Hite, George W. Hite and Darius Patterson, who were residents of Rush county. The summons was duly returned, “Served by reading,” etc., “April 20th, 1878,” and judgment by default was taken against each of the appellants for a sum found due and owing by him to the principal defendant. Afterward, and within two years, the parties appeared and the appellants filed their motion, supported by the separate affidavit of each, to set aside the judgment and default, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rowell v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Bush v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Smith v. NoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Ryan v. BurkamIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Krug v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Nietert v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Zerger v. FlatteryIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API