Legal Opinion
Maggio v. Shalala
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 12, 1999No. 1:98-cv-00037PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of judgment. Plaintiff initiated this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1395ff(b) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) denying Medicare Part B coverage for dental services. The Secretary has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the following reasons, the Secretary’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marion W. CHIPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Chipman v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Pfalzgraf v. ShalalaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fournier v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Lodge v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Born v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Muth v. SebeliusDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012