Legal Opinion
Chipman v. Shalala
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 18, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-2361-GTVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1395ff(b) for judicial review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) denying a part of plaintiffs claim for Supplemental Medical Insurance Benefits under Part B of Medicare. The plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment 1 (Doe. 9) which seeks an order reversing the decision of the Secretary, while the defendant has filed a motion for an order affirming the Secretary’s decision (Doc. 13). For the reasons which follow, the Secretary’s decision…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Laura J. Dixon v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Holloway v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Ben GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maggio v. ShalalaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Fournier v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012