Legal Opinion
Pfalzgraf v. Shalala
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00124PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(e), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of judgment. Plaintiff initiated this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to seek review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) denying payment under Medicare Part A, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., and the Secretary has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the following reasons, the Secretary’s motion is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walter E. Parker v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Eugenio CRUZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Isabel RIVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Schisler v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vasquez-Ortiz v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Maggio v. ShalalaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999