Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Felt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. N. B. Hyatt, Judge. Action for the recovery of specific personal property. Judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

On the eighteenth day of December. 1888, W. A. East made to the plaintiff bank a mortgage on certain personal property which is the subject of this suit. On the eighteenth day of March, 1889, and again on the eighteenth day of June, 1889, said East made a mortgage to Mrs. Felt, defendant, and the same property is included in these mortgages together, and Mrs. Felt took possession of the property September 1,-1891. This action is to recover the possession of the property, by virtue of the mortgage to plaintiff, which was filed for record on the twentieth day of December, 1888.

1 *5342 *5353 *533The first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhutasel v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Wells v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Brock v. BarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Shellhammer v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. Andregg v. BrunskillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loranz & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Westinghouse Co. v. McGrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Dierling v. PettitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Summer Thomas v. LawlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Wertheimer Degen v. ShulticeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API