Brock v. Barr
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaslta GirovÁt Gourt. ActioN in detinue to recover the value of certain personal property wrongfully taken from plaintiff by defendant. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBegs, J.
I. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace to recover the value of a buggy and harness, of the i appeal-ismitroversy • datemcertm-cate of judge. aggregate value of $85, which were levied upon defendant, who flie sheriff of the county, under an execution against one Lewis. The petition, ag we understand the abstract, shows that the plaintiff claims the property under a mortgage executed by Lewis, and that written notice of plaintiff’s claim to the jiroperty, and demand of possession thereof, was, as required by statute, served upon defendant. The answer of defendant admits the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wells v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by10 opinions
- Silver v. Wickfield Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Producers Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Estes v. SpringerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Westinghouse Co. v. McGrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Brush v. Incorporated Town of LiscombSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.