Legal Opinion

United States v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 13, 1992No. Civ. A. CV 91-L-0443-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYNNE, Senior District Judge.

This action was submitted upon cross-motions for summary judgment upon the pleadings and undisputed facts. Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1729, plaintiff sues to recover of defendant the reasonable costs of care or services furnished to the veterans named in the amended complaint 1 to the extent the veterans (or the provider of care or services) would be eligible to receive payment if the care of or services had not been furnished by a facility operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, an agency of the United States. 2

During the years 1987-1990 the eight…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. State of New Jersey Violent Crimes Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. State of Maryland Criminal Injuries Compensation Board of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Capital Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Capital Blue CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API