United States v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYNNE, Senior District Judge.
This action was submitted upon cross-motions for summary judgment upon the pleadings and undisputed facts. Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1729, plaintiff sues to recover of defendant the reasonable costs of care or services furnished to the veterans named in the amended complaint 1 to the extent the veterans (or the provider of care or services) would be eligible to receive payment if the care of or services had not been furnished by a facility operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, an agency of the United States. 2
During the years 1987-1990 the eight…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. State of New Jersey Violent Crimes Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. State of Maryland Criminal Injuries Compensation Board of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Capital Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Capital Blue CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992