United States v. H. M. Young Associates, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
The United States appeals from the judgment1 of the Customs Court which granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denied appellant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, 69 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 4388, 349 F.Supp. 1007 (1972). We affirm.
The imported merchandise consists of elastic fabric, described as “COTTON TISSUES (Waistband-Elastic).” The *723importer, H. M. Young Associates, Inc., of New York, purchased the subject merchandise from the manufacturer, HCH Kalbskopf of West Germany, in 1965 at an invoiced price of 62 cents per yard F.O.B., and the merchandise was so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- The United States v. Pan American Import Corp., M. H. Garvey Co., the United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re EickmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re VossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Nichols & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.