Legal Opinion

Maryland Indemnity Insurance v. Kornke

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1974No. 594, September Term, 1973PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

We are here confronted with a “clear-cut set of facts” 1 requiring a decision as to whether the coverage afforded by the omnibus clause of an automobile liability insurance policy extends to the “second permittee” — the driver of the insured vehicle as distinguished from the borrower or “first permittee” — and under circumstances where the insured owner restricted the operation of his car to the first permittee but the latter was a passenger at the time of the accident.

The issue was presented to the trial court (Jenifer, J.) upon a stipulation of facts and the deposition of the first…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Osborne v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeJarnette v. Federal Kemper InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Federal Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Weathers v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. BroadieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Allstate Insurance v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API