Legal Opinion

Duggar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1985No. 13964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant filed a motion under Rule 27.26 seeking to vacate convictions for felonious stealing and first-degree robbery. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and overruled the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Movant’s point on appeal contends the trial judge’s ruling was erroneous because movant’s appointed counsel did not amend the motion to present the contentions “in a lawyer-like fashion” and the judge failed to give movant notice of his intention to rule on the motion. We find no merit to these contentions.

The motion was stated on the form…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Wheatley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Pool v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. PerezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Frederick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Woods v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Lowery v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API