Legal Opinion

Frederick v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1988No. 53863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Movant, Milford Frederick, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse in part and remand.

In 1984 appellant was convicted of first degree sexual abuse, attempt to commit sodomy, and sodomy, and sentenced to consecutive terms of one year, two years, and six years imprisonment. We affirmed the conviction by per curiam order in State v. Frederick, 692 S.W.2d 840 (Mo.App.1985). On October 15, 1986, appellant filed a pro se motion pursuant to Rule 27.26 alleging six grounds for relief. On appeal appellant asserts error only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. AndersenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bannister v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. McAlester v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GuidorziMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Wooldridge v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Kuhlenberg v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. GateleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API