Legal Opinion
OCONUS DOD Employee Rotation Action Group v. Cohen
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-118 GKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs ask the Court to invalidate “Draft Subchapter 1230,” which they claim was implemented to limit to five years the amount of time civilian employees may serve overseas. The organizational Plaintiff, OCONUS DOD Employee Rotation Action Group, (also known as “Outside Continental United States Department of Defense Employee Rotation Action Group”), is an unincorporated association of approximately 125 career civil servants assigned to overseas positions, primarily in Europe, with the Department of Defense (“DOD”). The two named individual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Catskill Development v. Park Place EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association v. WeichertDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020