Sepulveda v. Sepulveda
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventeenth District, Los Angeles County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
This was an action brought by the appellant under the provisions of Section 254 of the Practice Act, for the purpose of determining an adverse claim, set up by the respondents, to certain real estate, alleged to be in possession of the appellant, and whereof she claimed to be seized in fee. At the trial, upon motion of the respondents, a judgment of non-suit was entered against her, and from that judgment she has taken this appeal.
The motion was based upon four several grounds. The first was, that it did not appear that the appellant had such a possession of the premises as would enable her…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Lyle v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lange v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Wolverton v. NicholsMontana Supreme Court · 1883
- Blasdel v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1874
- City of Fort Bragg v. BrandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.