Legal Opinion

Hoppough v. . Struble

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1875PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The judgment cannot be sustained upon the ground or for the reasons assigned by the referee. His legal conclusions are clearly erroneous. There is no ambiguity in the description of the premises conveyed to the defendant. The boundaries of the lands granted by the plaintiff to Margery Hoppough, and excepted from the grant to the defendant, are well defined; and that deed, by the reference to it in the deed to the defendant, is as if incorporated in that deed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson ex dem. Lowell v. ParkhurstNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Meeker v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. East v. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Miceli v. RileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API