Legal Opinion

Hackmann v. Sommerfor Development Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1987No. 51818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Presiding Judge.

This is an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff, Theresa Hackmann d/b/a Hackmann Building Contractors, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting her $10,237.12 for carpentry work but denying her a priority lien against the subject property. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

In June of 1979, as part of a condominium development project, defendant, Som-erfor Development Corporation (Somerfor), contracted with plaintiff for certain carpentry services. Community Federal Savings and Loan Association (Community Federal)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Building Corp. v. Ventura Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Vonder Haar Concrete Co. v. Edwards-Parker, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. R. J. Stephens Drywall & Painting Co. v. Taylor-Morley-Simon, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Erbs v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Kranz v. Centropolis Crusher, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Pilla v. Tom-Boy, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Medlin v. RLC., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Hickham v. ChronisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. May Department Stores Co. v. QueenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API