Legal Opinion

Pilla v. Tom-Boy, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1988No. 53557PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Presiding Judge.

Appellants, Edward A. Pilla and Dollie A. Pilla, appeal the denial of their claim for indemnity based upon a lease provision against respondent, Tom-Boy, Inc. to recover sums paid in settlement to Mary Brackett for injuries sustained in her fall on a sidewalk adjacent to the building owned by the Pillas and leased to TomBoy, Inc.

Appellants contend that the trial court erred in failing to find respondent breached the indemnity provision of the lease. Specifically, appellants allege that: (1) the settlement made to Mary Brackett was not a voluntary payment and no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Missouri District Telegraph Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Federal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Rental Storage & Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Snowden v. GaynorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chehval v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Howe v. Lever Bros. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Uelk v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Stephenson v. First Missouri Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API