State v. Ciancanelli

*285GILLETTE, J.

In this criminal proceeding, we are asked to decide whether ORS 167.062, which makes it a crime to, among other things, “direct, manage, finance or present” a “live public show” in which the participants engage in “sexual conduct” violates the free expression rights guaranteed by Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution.1 Drawing on the “Robertson framework,”2 which this court uses to address free expression issues that arise under Article I, section 8, defendant argues that the statute is unconstitutional because it is directed, by its terms, at a form of expression and…