Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1933No. 3955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

Rose Rogers, plaintiff, as a feme solfe, instituted this suit in the district court of Gray Comity against the defendants W. T. Eraser, W. C. Upton, and M. P. Downs, to recover the sum of $3,500, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from April 24, 192S.

She alleges that on January 11, 1928, the defendants were fire insurance agents doing business at Pampa, Tex., as a copartnership under the firm name of Fraser-Upton & Downs. That on said date the defendants, as such agents, solicited her to purchase two insurance policies covering loss by fire on: her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. WhiteheadTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. National Fire Ins. v. CarterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Merchants' & Bankers' Fire Underwriters v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. ShadidTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  2. Brough v. Presidential Fire Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API