Legal Opinion

Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Shadid

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1934No. 1485—6206PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMEDLEY, Judge.

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment of the county court in favor of defendant in error Shadid, the insured, against plaintiff in error, Franklin Fire Insurance Company, the insurer, for damage from fire to a residence and wearing apparel. There is no statement of facts. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court are as follows:

“Findings of Fact.
“On the 25th day of February, 1930, the defendant issued its regular policy of fire insurance to W. W. Shadid in the sum of $2,500.00 insuring him against loss or damage by fire, the residence described in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roco v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Tinsley v. DowellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. National Fire Ins. v. CarterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Phillips v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. British General Insurance v. RipyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Mrs. Cecil Harvey (Betty) Allen, a Feme SoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Employers Casualty Company v. WinslowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Lowe v. Michigan Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API