Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Lindley
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
Appellees recovered judgment against appellant upon a fire insurance policy. The controlling issue presented here is the alleged invalidity of the policy in question by reason of a breach of the following contractual warranty clauses appearing therein: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void * * * if the interest of the insured in the property be other than unconditional and sole ownership; or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple * * ■
The essential facts…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bills v. Hibernia Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Weed v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Brown v. Commercial Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Phœnix Insurance v. Public Parks Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- National Fire Ins. v. CarterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lindley v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Lindley v. Franklin Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- State and County Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. KinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Old Reliable Fire Insurance Co. v. Alduro-Raynes Arabians, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986