Legal Opinion

Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Lindley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1935No. 4375PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Appellees recovered judgment against appellant upon a fire insurance policy. The controlling issue presented here is the alleged invalidity of the policy in question by reason of a breach of the following contractual warranty clauses appearing therein: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void * * * if the interest of the insured in the property be other than unconditional and sole ownership; or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple * * ■

The essential facts…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bills v. Hibernia Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Weed v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Brown v. Commercial Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Phœnix Insurance v. Public Parks Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  5. National Fire Ins. v. CarterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindley v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  2. Lindley v. Franklin Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State and County Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. KinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Old Reliable Fire Insurance Co. v. Alduro-Raynes Arabians, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API