Legal Opinion

Cronen v. Wegdahl Cooperative Elevator Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1979No. 49046PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This appeal is by writ of certiorari to the Workers’ Compensation Division for review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals. We affirm.

Relators challenge the commission’s application of Minn.St. 176.061 in calculating relators’ share of a recovery on behalf of employee from a third party. The parties raise the following issues:

1. Should relators’ attorneys fees be included as part of costs of collection under Minn.St. 176.061, subd. 6(a), where relators’ attorney was not actively involved in obtaining recovery from the third party?

2. Should the amount of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Twin City LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Hagen v. VenemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API