Legal Opinion

Hardegree v. Zink

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1963No. Nos. 39567, 39568PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The above styled and numbered cases were consolidated for trial below and will be treated as consolidated cases here.

*156We will first consider and dispose of the appeal in No. 39,567. In doing so we will refer to the plaintiff in error, Dan L. Harde-gree, as “plaintiff”; to defendant in error, Townsend M. Zink, as “defendant”; and to the remaining defendant in error as “Bond”.

On February 21, 1955, J. H. and Emma Poole executed and delivered to plaintiff, for a consideration of $5.00 an acre, an oil and gas lease covering minerals above 1250 feet underlying the NE/4, Sec. 29, T.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Forbes v. BeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Burkett v. SnakardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tyler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. A. Dean Allison and Victor F. Reiserer v. Home-Stake Production Company, a Corporation, and C. W. StaatsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API