Legal Opinion

Virdanco, Inc. v. MTS International

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1991No. 90CA1590PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TURSI.

Defendants, MTS International and Robert C. Hughes, appeal the final judgment entered against them by the trial court, jointly and severally, and in favor of plaintiff, Virdanco, Inc., on its claim for exemplary damages attendant to defendants’ breach of fiduciary duties. We affirm.

Hughes is the president, director, and sole shareholder of MTS, a collection agency, to which Virdanco referred its accounts receivable for collection.

This dispute commenced when MTS failed to honor Virdanco’s request for an accounting of money collected on its accounts. Although MTS…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Silverstein v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Holter v. Moore and Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Interest of BlackColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Patterson v. BP America Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Allred v. Innova Emergency Medical Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  4. Casey v. Colorado Higher Education Insurance Benefits Alliance TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Hildebrand v. Wilmar CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API