Casey v. Colorado Higher Education Insurance Benefits Alliance Trust
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge HAWTHORNE
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
158 Because I believe that the employees' breach of fiduciary duty claim is barred by the CGIA, I respectfully dissent as to Part IILC.1.2a. 'of the majority's opinion. And be*209cause I do not believe that the employees' unilateral and mutual mistake claims are barred by the CGIA, I respectfully dissent as to Part II.C.3. of the majority's opinion. I also dissent as to the majority's conclusions concerning these issues in Part III. However, I concur with the remainder of the opinion.
I. Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim
"[ 59 I would conclude…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.