Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Casey v. Colorado Higher Education Insurance Benefits Alliance Trust

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2012No. 10CA1188Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge HAWTHORNE

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

158 Because I believe that the employees' breach of fiduciary duty claim is barred by the CGIA, I respectfully dissent as to Part IILC.1.2a. 'of the majority's opinion. And be*209cause I do not believe that the employees' unilateral and mutual mistake claims are barred by the CGIA, I respectfully dissent as to Part II.C.3. of the majority's opinion. I also dissent as to the majority's conclusions concerning these issues in Part III. However, I concur with the remainder of the opinion.

I. Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim

"[ 59 I would conclude…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API