Legal Opinion
Cannady v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 15, 1949No. 15022PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, Justice.
Lon. Cannady sued Dallas' Railway & Terminal Company for personal and property damages sustained in a collision between his Ford truck and a street car at a street intersection in the City of Dallas, Texas.
No question is raised here challenging ■the sufficiency of the pleadings. Trial was to a jury on special issues.
All acts of primary negligence and contributory negligence were properly pleaded. The issues and their answers reveal the contentions of the respective parties. The jury verdict convicted defendant of several acts of negligence proximately causing the collision and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ramirez v. AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Le Master v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Armstrong v. West Texas Rig CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Carney v. Roberts Inv. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
- Brown v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Albert Garza and Felicita Garza, Individually and as Next Friend of Their Child, Robert Garza, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Powell v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.