Legal Opinion
Betancourt v. Storke Housing Investors
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 2002No. B145835Published
1Opinion of the Court
114 Cal.Rptr.2d 551 (2001)
94 Cal.App.4th 709
R. BETANCOURT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
STORKE HOUSING INVESTORS et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B145835.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six.
December 18, 2001.
Review Granted April 10, 2002.
Gilbert & Sackman, Kenneth J. Sackman, Steven M. Rehaut and Laurie A. Traktman, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Mullen & Henzell, Derek B. Lipscombe, Los Angeles, and Rafael Gonzalez, for Defendants and Respondents.
PERREN, J.
Plaintiff laborers, relying upon Civil Code[1] section 3110, filed a mechanics' lien against the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.