In Re Marriage of Fotsch
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY
delivered the opinion of the court:
The present cause comes before this court as a permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308), and concerns a trial judge’s authority to adjudicate a matter in part upon transcripts of prior proceedings before another judge. The underlying matter is a contested petition for a change of child custody.
The record reveals that in November 1982 the circuit court entered a judgment dissolving the nine-year marriage of John Fotsch (John) and Catherine Fotsch, now Catherine Wilson (Catherine).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fitchburg Steam Engine Co. v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Kirshenbaum v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Christopher v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Becher-Barrett-Lockerby Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Smith v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Anderson v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Smith v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Anderson v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.