Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Fotsch

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 9, 1985No. 85-831PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

The present cause comes before this court as a permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308), and concerns a trial judge’s authority to adjudicate a matter in part upon transcripts of prior proceedings before another judge. The underlying matter is a contested petition for a change of child custody.

The record reveals that in November 1982 the circuit court entered a judgment dissolving the nine-year marriage of John Fotsch (John) and Catherine Fotsch, now Catherine Wilson (Catherine).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitchburg Steam Engine Co. v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  3. Kirshenbaum v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Christopher v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Becher-Barrett-Lockerby Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Smith v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Anderson v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Smith v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Anderson v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API