Legal Opinion
Perkins v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 8, 2006PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
890 A.2d 997 (2006)
383 N.J. Super. 99
Mary PERKINS, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 14, 2005.
Decided February 8, 2006.
Nyran Rose Pearson, Chicago IL, (Miller, Faucher and Cafferty) of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Cooper, Levenson, April, Niedelman & Wagenheim, attorneys; Fredric L. Shenkman, Atlantic City, Marvin A. Miller, Ms. Pearson, and William R. Kane, on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Daaleman v. Elizabethtown Gas CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ana Alpizar-Fallas v. Frank FaveroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- DepoLink Court Reporting & Litigation Support Services v. RochmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Arcand v. Brother International Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Hoffman v. Asseenontv. Com, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.