Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 27, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01557Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROLANDA LLOYD, CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01557 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Defendants. This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment of Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“GCRTA”) and Jack Barnett (“Barnett”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. No. 37.) Plaintiff Rolanda Lloyd (“Lloyd”) filed a brief in opposition on March 31, 2020, to which Defendants replied on April 17, 2020. (Doc.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. John B. Johnson v. University of Cincinnati, Joseph A. Steger, and Donald C. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API