Palfy v. First Bank of Valdez
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONEY, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Fern Palfy, contends that she was wrongfully deprived of her day in court when the superior court directed a verdict in favor of the appellee, The First Bank of Valdez. The superior court judgment from which this appeal was taken is based upon a finding of res judicata or collateral estoppel. Because the lower court’s judgment seems to have been, to some extent, the product of confusion as to the background of this case, a careful review of the facts will greatly advance a resolution of the problems raised on appeal.
At some time during the spring of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Luisi Truck Lines, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Pennington v. SnowAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Treat v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Murray v. FeightAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Kent v. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Pride v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Moran v. PolandAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- White v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.