Treat v. Ellis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Adherence to the decision in Ellis v. Treat, supra, makes the determination of the present suit comparatively simple. In the former suit plaintiff sought to enforce a contract concerning personal property; whereas, by this suit plaintiffs seek to enforce a contract concerning real estate. The opinion of the court in the former suit was that the allegations of the complaint failed to show that Ellis, the appellant therein, ever promised or agreed to convey to the appellees therein, Treat and Smith, any interest in the mining claims, but did agree to convey to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Miller v. MargerieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- McNamara v. Home Land & Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Palfy v. First Bank of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1970