Legal Opinion

In Re NASDAQ Market Makers Antitrust Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 25, 1996No. MDL No. 1023. No. 96 Civil 2614 (RWS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

929 F.Supp. 174 (1996)

In re NASDAQ MARKET MAKERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

Robert Kevin TISDALE and Lillian A. Tisdale, Plaintiffs,

v.

A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, et al., Defendants.

MDL No. 1023. No. 96 Civil 2614 (RWS).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 25, 1996.

Bainbridge & Straus, Birmingham, AL, New York City (Michael Straus, of counsel), Lovell & Skirnick, Liaison Counsel, New York City (Christopher Lovell, of counsel), for Plaintiffs.

Shearman & Sterling, Liaison Counsel, New York City (Joseph T. McLaughlin, James T. Halverson, Robert Steinbuch, of counsel), for Defendants and Herzog…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Seven Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. DurrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Rand v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API