Legal Opinion

Eikelberger v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

Plaintiff and three other clerical assistants in the office of the county clerk filed small bills for compensation for overtime employment. The board of county commissioners rejected their claims. They sued, then assigned all their claims to one of their number, and' by agreement and consent of parties the proceedings were tried and decided as a single action. The district court gave judgment for defendant.

That judgment was rendered on March 6, 1939. Three months later plaintiff served and filed a notice of appeal, which reads:

*620"notice op…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartzell v. MageeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Morell v. MassaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  3. Rodenberg ex rel. Bachman v. RodenbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Heniff v. ClausenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Polzin v. National Cooperative Refinery Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Allbritten v. National Acceptance Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API