Legal Opinion

Hartzell v. Magee

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1899No. 11266PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from court of appeals, southern department; A. W. Dennison, B. F. Milton, and M. Schoonover, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Joi-inston, J. :

This was an action of replevin, brought by William Magee to recover a stock of merchandise which had been previously seized by S. T. Hartzell as sheriff, upon attachment process. Magee claimed to have purchased the goods from J. T. Pershall, but the creditors of Pershall alleged that the transfer was fraudulent, Accordingly the good faith of the parties and the honesty of the transaction were submitted to a jury, but their verdict was against Magee. He attempted to take the case to the court of appeals, and when it came on for review in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Atkins v. Nordyke-Marmon Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Magee v. HartzellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HelmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Samson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Russell v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Eikelberger v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API