In re the Accounting by Ellinger
New York Surrogate's Court
Proceeding to settle accounts of executors.
1Opinion of the Court
Schulz, S.
Objections designated “ a ” and “ b ” are sustained. The executors have only accounted for the rents under a written lease which does not affect the building known as 815 Union avenue. It is conceded in the so-called “ answer to the objections ” which it was consented might be considered as an amendment to the account, and it is not disputed, that the rent of the upper apartment in said building, exclusive of the widow’s quarantine, amounted to the sum of $1,232, and that the disbursements for the entire house aggregated $1,161.32, showing a net balance of income from the upper…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Konvalinka v. . SchlegelNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- In Re the Accounting of GordenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Adsit v. AdsitNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Horstmann v. . FlegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Myers v. . BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
- In re the Estate of RehillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of SchlossmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re HollmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.