Legal Opinion

Wieber v. England

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1931No. File No. 7069PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Claimant, Charles H. Wieber, filed a claim for compensation against R. P. England and Georgia Casualty Company. He alleged that he sustained and suffered an injury to- his left eye, that arose out of, and in the course of, his employment. The particular date of the injury will receive our attention later; however, it took place-either on the 13th or 14th of June, 1923.

Workmen’s Compensation insurance was carried by England in the Georgia Casualty Company. Both defendants resisted the claim and a board of arbitration was appointed to try the issues. The first board decided in favor of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Coke & Gas Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bloomington-Bedford Stone Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Day v. Sioux Falls Fruit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Tanderup v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Plymouth County Bank v. GilmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. La Bolt Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Jacobson v. Strong & WaggonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Barwin v. Ind. Sch. Dist. Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Detling v. TessierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Argo Oil Corporation v. LathropSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API