Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Early

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided July 10, 1946No. 144PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKSDALE, District Judge.

When this action was called for trial on June 27, 1946, after both sides had announced themselves ready, plaintiff’s counsel stated to the court that they thought the undisputed facts set out in the complaint and answer entitled plaintiff to the relief sought, and that they therefore did not desire to introduce evidence. In response to inquiry by the court, plaintiff’s counsel advised that they desired that the action be considered by the court as on a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, and defendants’ counsel stated that they would waive notice of such a motion…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. Communist Party, USA v. MoyseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Harvey v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  4. United States v. 673 Cases of Distilled Spirits & WinesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  5. Young v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API