Legal Opinion
Oliver v. City of Richmond
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 17, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.
' The plaintiffs in error are Marion C. Oliver, H. S. Saunders, Geo. Y. Webster and Mabel L. Webster, James P. Harrison, Thos. W. Clark, M. D. Nunnally, J. M. Gill, M. S; Alexander, R. S. Christian, Geo. B. White, H. C. Boschen, W. H. Boschen, Wilhelmine R. Schmidt, Frank C. Wood, Mary H. Davenport, Fitch Ingalls, E. L. Harwood, Frank S. Richardson and Dutch Gap Land Corporation. They own land on the James river which they claim will be damaged by the improvement in navigation of the river by reason of the fact that said improvement will cause *540the river to be diverted from their lands to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wernberg v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Ruddock v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Mundy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Mayes v. MannSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- City of Virginia Beach v. The Virginia Marine Resources Commission and Philip G. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.