Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Mann

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The appellants, who were the complainants below, instituted a suit in chancery in their capacity as taxpayers of the city of Norfolk which had for its purpose the recovery of $10,100 from the appellee, James Mann, which was the amount of a certain check made by the city and cashed by him. It was alleged that he illegally appropriated said sum which belonged to the city. A demurrer to the bill was interposed and sustained by the court below and the bill was dismissed.

By an ordinance adopted by the council of the city of Norfolk on January 14,1930, it was sought to acquire 14.841 acres of land…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Brack v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Page v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Ruddock v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  5. City of Richmond v. ChildreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ewell v. LambertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  2. Gemmell v. PowersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API