Legal Opinion

Mundy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 16, 1990No. 121-88LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This takings case is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary-judgment. As part of its flood control efforts, the United States Army Corps of Engineers impounds and periodically releases water from the Gathrig'ht Dam, 38 miles upstream of the plaintiffs’ property. The plaintiffs allege that the actions of the Corps of Engineers flood the plaintiffs’ low-water bridge over the Jackson River, rendering their property inaccessible during the periods of flooding, and diminishing the value of the property. Therefore, the plaintiffs argue that they are entitled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Loving v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Boerner v. McCallisterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Oak Forest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API