Lorenzen v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
In this post-conviction relief (PCR) case, the Court granted the State’s petition for certiorari to review the PCR judge’s decision granting relief with respect to Larry Lorenzen’s convictions for first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor and second-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor. We reverse.
FACTS
At trial, the following facts were established regarding the charges. The victim, who was fourteen years old at the time of trial, testified Lorenzen was a family friend who regularly spent time with her mother and often visited her father at his separate residence.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Putnam v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. TappCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.