Legal Opinion

Putnam v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2012-212396; Opinion No. 5408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKEMY, J.:

In this post-conviction relief (PCR) action, Martina R. Putnam contends the PCR court erred in dismissing her application for PCR and finding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to adequately prepare her ease and call witnesses to testify in her defense. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Putnam was charged with homicide by child abuse in the death of her thirteen-month-old son (the Victim). At trial, the State sought to prove Putnam willfully and unlawfully killed the Victim by abuse or neglect. Putnam attempted to shift suspicion to her husband, Patrick, and her older…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Dempsey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
  3. Weldon v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API