Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 2012No. 4946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFew, C.J.

This is a post-conviction relief (PCR) action arising out of Joseph Walker’s convictions for kidnapping and first-degree criminal sexual conduct. The circuit court granted Walker’s PCR application based on trial counsel’s failure to investigate a potential alibi witness and the cumulative prejudicial effect of three other alleged instances of deficient performance. We agree with the PCR court that trial counsel’s performance regarding the alibi witness was deficient under the Sixth Amendment. However, we find the witness’s testimony presented at the PCR hearing did not meet the legal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. AlekseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API